Reference literature on dialogue


  • Adelswärd, Viveka and Öberg, Britt-Marie. 1998. The function of laughter and joking in negotiation activities. International Journal of Humor Research. 11(4): 411-429.
  • Adelswärd, Viveka. 1992. Interviewer styles: On interactive strategies in professional interviews. In Grindsted A. and Wagner J. (eds.) Communication for specific purposes [Fachsprachliche Kommunikation]. Gunther Narr Verlag. Tübingen, 143-163.
  • Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Bayley, Paul (ed.). 2004. Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Bazzanella, Carla (ed.). 1996. Repetition in dialogue. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
  • Bazzanella, Carla. (ed.). 2002. Sul dialogo: Contesti e forme di interazione verbale. Milano: Guerini.
  • Berthoud, A. C. and Mondada L. (eds.). 2000. Modèles du discours en confrontation. Berne: Peter Lang.
  • Beversluis, J. 2000. Cross-examining Socrates: A defense of the interlocutors in Plato's early dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bonfantini, Massimo A. and Ponzio, Augusto. 1987. Dialogo sui dialoghi. Ravenna: Longo.
  • Bonfantini, Massimo A., Petrilli, Susan and Ponzio, Augusto. 2000. Three dialogues on rhetoric, argumentation and new media. Semiotica 128, 1(2): 69-112.
  • Bravo, Diana. 1996. La risa en el regateo: Estudio sobre el estilo comunicativo de negociadores españoles y suecos [Laughter in bargains: A study on the communicative style of Spanish and Swedish negotiators]. Stockholm: Akademi-Tryck AB. Stockholms Universitet.
  • Bravo, Diana. 2002. Actos asertivos y cortesía. Imagen del rol en el discurso de académicos argentinos [Assertive speech acts and politeness. Face-role in Argentinean academic discourse]. Placencia, Maria E. and Bravo, D (eds.) Actos de habla y cortesía en español [Speech Acts and Politeness in Spanish]. London, Lincom Studies in Pragmatics 5, 2002, 141-174.
  • Breton, Phillipe. 1996. L'argumentation dans la communication. Paris: La Découverte/Repères.
  • Brumark, Åsa. 2006. Non-observance of Gricean maxims in family dinner conversations. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1206-1238.
  • Brumark, Åsa. 2006. Regulatory talk and politeness at the family dinner table. Pragmatics 16, 2/3, 171-213.
  • Burton, Deidre. 1980. Dialogue and discourse: A sociolinguistic approach to modern drama dialogue and naturally occurring conversation. London.
  • Cattani, Adelino. 2001. Botta e risposta: L'arte della replica. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  • Charaudeau, Patrick. 1995. Le dialogue dans un modèle de discourse. Cahiers de linguistique française 17, Université de Genève.
  • Clayman, Steven and Heritage, John. 2002. The news interviews: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dascal, Marcelo, Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rigotti, Eddo, Stati, Sorin and Rocci, Andrea (eds.). 2005. Argumentation in dialogic interaction, Special Issue of Studies in Communication Sciences.
  • Dascal, Marcelo and Chang, H. (eds.) 2007. Traditions of controversy. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Dascal, Marcelo. 2008. Dichotomies and types of debate. In Eemeren, Frans H. van and Garssen, Bart (eds.), Controversy and confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory, 27-49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Davies, Bronwyn and Harré, Rom. 1990. Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour 20(1): 44-63.
  • Dickerson, P. 2001. Disputing with care: Analysing interviewees' treatment of interviewers' prior turns in televised political interviews. Discourse Studies 3: 203-222.
  • Doury, Marianne. 1997. Le débat immobile. Paris: Kimé.
  • Drew, P. and J. Heritage (eds.). 1992. Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Eemeren, Frans H. van and Grootendorst, Rob. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions. A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordrecht/Cinnaminson: Foris Publications , PDA 1.
  • Eemeren, Frans H. van and Grootendorst, Rob. 1992. Argumentation, communication and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ehlich, Konrad and Wagner, Johannes (eds.). 1995. The discourse of business negotiations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Filliettaz, Laurent. 2002. La parole en action. Éléments de pragmatique psycho-sociale. Quebec: Nota bene.
  • Firth, Alan (ed.). 1995. The discourse of negotiation. Oxford: Pergsmon.
  • François, F. 1990. La communication inégale: Heurs et malheurs de l'interaction verbale. Neuchâtel: Délachaux et Niestlé.
  • François, F. 1993. Pratiques de l'oral. Dialogue, jeu et variations des figures du sens. Paris : Nathan pédagogie.
  • Franklin, M. and Norton, P. (eds). 1993. Parliamentary questions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fritz, Gerd. 1995. Topics in the history of dialogue forms. In Jucker, Andreas H. (ed.) Historical pragmatics, 469-498. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
  • Fritz, Gerd. 2005. On answering accusations in controversies. Studies in Communication Sciences 5: 151-162.
  • Garzone, Giuliana and Ilie, Cornelia (eds.). 2007. The use of English in institutional and business settings: An intercultural perspective. Bern: Peter Lang.
  • Gille, Johan. 2001. Pautas argumentativas en el diálogo espontáneo. Un estudio de conversaciones intra e interculturales [Patterns of Argumentation in Spontaneous Dialogue. An Investigation of Intra- and Intercultural Conversations]. Diss. Stockholm: Dept. of Spanish and Portuguese, Stockholm University.
  • Goffman, Erving. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
  • Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction ritual. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  • Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Gomard, Kirsten and Krogstad, Anne (eds.). 2001. Instead of the ideal debate: Doing politics anxd doing gender in Nordic political campaign discourse. Århus: Århus University Press.
  • Grimshaw, Allen D. (ed.). 1990. Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversation. Cambridge.
  • Gumperz, John. 1982. Discourse practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hellegouarc'h, J. (ed.). 1997. L'art de la conversation. Paris: Classiques Garnier.
  • Heritage, J. and D. Greatbatch. 1991. On the institutional character of institutional talk: the case of news interviews. In D. Boden and D. Zimmerman (eds) Talk and Social Structure, 93-137). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Heritage, J. and Roth, A. L. 1995. Grammar and institution: Questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28(1): 1-60.
  • Herman, Vimala. 1995. Dramatic discourse: Dialogue as interaction in plays. London.
  • Herman, Vimala. 1998. Multiple ‘floors' and ‘turns' in drama. Journal of literary semantics 27(2): 110-127.
  • Hmed, Neijete. 2003. Analyse comparative des interactions. Le cas de trois commerces: français, tunisien et franco-maghrébin, thèse de doctorat en sciences du langage. Université Lumière Lyon 2.
  • Hopper, R. 1992. Telephone conversation. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  • Hundsnurscher, Franz. 2005. Studien zur Dialoggrammatik. Stuttgart: Heinz Akademischer Verlag.
  • Ilie, Cornelia. 1999. Question-response argumentation in talk shows. Journal of Pragmatics 31 (8): 975-999.
  • Ilie, Cornelia. 2000. Cliché-based metadiscursive argumentation in the Houses of Parliament. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10 (1): 65-84.
  • Ilie, Cornelia. 2001. Semi-institutional Discourse: The Case of Talk Shows. Journal of Pragmatics 33(2): 209-254.
  • Ilie, Cornelia. 2003. Histrionic and agonistic features of parliamentary discourse. Studies in Communication Sciences 3(1): 25-53.
  • Ilie, Cornelia. 2003. Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary debates. Journal of Language and Politics 1(2): 269-291.
  • Ilie, Cornelia (ed.). 2004. Language, culture, rhetoric: Cultural and rhetorical perspectives on communication. Uppsala: Akademitryck.
  • Ilie, Cornelia. 2004. Insulting as (un)parliamentary practice in the British and Swedish Parliaments: A rhetorical approach. In P. Bayley (ed.) Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, 45-86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Ilie, Cornelia. 2006. Parliamentary Discourses. In Keith Brown (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 2nd Edition, Vol. 9, 188-196. Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Ilie, Cornelia. 2006. Talk Shows. In Keith Brown (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 2nd Edition, Vol. 12, 489-494. Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Ilie, Cornelia. 2007. Negotiating roles and relationships in students' councils: A case of deliberative dialogue in schools. In J. Lainio and A. Leppänen (eds.) Linguistic diversity and sustainable development, 165-187. Eskilstuna: Bording AB.
  • Ilie, Cornelia. 2008. Talking the talk, walking the walk: Candidate profiles in election campaign interviews. In Gobber, Giovanni, S. Cantarini, S. Cigada, M.C. Gatti and S. Gilardoni (eds.) Proceedings of the IADA Workshop Word Meaning in Argumentative Dialogue. Homage to Sorin Stati. Volume II. L'analisi linguistica e letteraria XVI Special Issue, 2.
  • Ilie, Cornelia (ed.). 2010. European Parliaments under Scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Ilie, Cornelia. 2010. Identity co-construction in parliamentary discourse practices. In C. Ilie (ed.) European Parliaments under Scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Ilie, Cornelia. 2010. Managing dissent and maximising interpersonal relations in parliamentary discourse. In C. Ilie (ed.) European Parliaments under Scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, Liliana. 1999. Conversaţia: Structuri si strategii. Bucharest: All.
  • Jackson, Sally and Jacobs, Scott. 1980. Of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. Quarterly Journal of Speech 66: 251-265.
  • Jacques, Francis.1979. Dialogiques, recherches logiques sur le dialogue. Paris: PUF.
  • Jacques, Francis. 1988. Trois stratégies interactionnelles: conversation, négociation, dialogue. In J. Cosnier, N. Gelas and C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni (eds.). Echanges sur la conversation, 45-68. Paris: Editions du CNRS.
  • Jucker, Andreas H., Fritz, Gerd and Lebsanft, F. (eds.). 1999. Historical dialogue analysis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
  • Kallmeyer, Werner. 1996. Gesprächsrhetorik. Rhetorische Verfahren im Gesprächsprozess. Tübingen: Narr.
  • Kangasharju, Helena. 2002. Alignment in disagreement: forming oppositional alliances in committee meetings. Journal of Pragmatics 34, 1447 - 1471.
  • Kangasharju, Helena 1996. Aligning as a team in multiparty conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 26. 291 – 319.
  • Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine (ed.). 1991. La question. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
  • Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 1990. Les interactions verbales. Vol. 1. Paris: Armand Colin.
  • Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 1992. Les interactions verbales. Vol. 2. Paris: Armand Colin.
  • Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 1996. La conversation. Paris: Seuil.
  • Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine (ed.). 2004. Polylogues. Journal of Pragmatics 36.
  • Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 2005. Le discours en interaction. Paris: Armand Colin.
  • Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine and Traverso, Véronique (eds.). 2008. Les interactions en site commercial: Invariants et variations. Lyon: ENS editions.
  • Linell, Per. 1990. The power of dialogue dynamics. In Markova, I. and Foppa, K. (eds) The Dynamics of dialogue, 147-177, Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  • Linell, Per. 1998. Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Linell, Per and Korolija, Natascha, 1997. Coherence in multi-party conversation: Episodes in interaction. In: T. Givón (ed.) Conversation: Communicative, cognitive and cultural perspectives, 167-205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Mandala, Susan. 2007. Twentieth century drama dialogue as ordinary talk: Speaking between the lines. Franham: Ashgate.
  • Maranhão, Tullio. 1986. Therapeutic discourse and Socratic dialogue: A cultural critique. London: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Maranhão, Tullio (ed.). 1990. The interpretation of dialogue. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Marková, Ivan, Graumann, C.F & Foppa, K. (eds). 1995. Mutualities in dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Marková, Ivana and Linell, Per. 1996. Coding elementary contributions to dialogue: Individual acts versus dialogical interactions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 26: 353-373.
  • Marková, Ivan, Linell, Per, Grossen, M. & Salazar Orvig, A. 2007. Dialogue in focus groups: Exploring socially shared knowledge. London: Equinox.
  • Matoesian, G. 1999. The grammaticalization of participant roles in the constitution of expert identity. Language in Society 28(4): 491-521.
  • Mondada L. and Grosjean, M. (eds.). 2004. La negotiation au travail. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon.
  • Nauman, Bernd. (ed.). 1998. Dialogue analysis and the mass media. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
  • Nauman, Bernd. 2003. Chaotic dialogues. In M. Bondi and S. Stati (eds.) Dialogue Analysis 2000: Selected Papers from the 10th IADA Anniversary Conference, Bologna 2000, 253-264. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
  • Norén, Coco. 1999. Reformulation et conversation. De la sémantique du topos aux fonctions interactionnelles. Acta universitatis uppsaliensis, Studia Romanica, 60. Uppsala: Uppsala University Library.
  • Norén, Coco. 2006. Argumentation par autorité, polyphonie et discours rapporté. in: Perrin, L. (ed.). Le sens et ses voix. Dialogisme et polyphonie en langue et en discours, Recherches linguistiques, 28. Metz: Presses universitaires de Metz. 323-348.
  • Noris, S. and Jones, R. (eds.). 2005. Discourse in action: Introduction to mediated discourse analysis. London: Routledge.
  • Palonen, Kari. 2008. Speaking pro et contra: The rhetorical intelligibility of parliamentary politics and the political intelligibility of parliamentary rhetoric. In Soininen, Suvi and Turkka, Tapani (eds) The parliamentary style of politics. Helsinki: The Finnish Political Science Association.
  • Plantin, Christian. 1990. Essais sur l'argumentation. Introduction à l'étude de la parole argumentative. Paris: Kimé.
  • Plantin, Christian and Doury, Marianne and Traverso, Véronique (eds.). 2000. Les emotions dans les interactions. Lyon: ARCI-Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
  • Reilly, R. G. 1987. Communication failure in dialogue and discourse. Amsterdam: North Holland.
  • Scannell, Paddy (ed.). 1991. Broadcast talk. London: Sage.
  • Snyder R., Jon. 1989. Writing the scene of speaking: Theories of dialogue in the late Italian Renaissance. Stanford University Press.
  • Stati, Sorin. 1982. Il dialogo: Considerazioni di linguistica pragmatica. Napoli: Liguori.
  • Stati, Sorin. 1986. Cinque miti della parola. Lezioni di lessicologia testuale. Bologna: Pàtron.
  • Stati, Sorin. 1996. Repetition in literary dialogues. In Bazzanella, Carla (ed.) Repetition in dialogue, 167-173. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
  • Stati, Sorin. 2002. Principi di analisi argomentativa. Retorica, logica, linguistica. Bologna: Pàtron.
  • Svennevig, Jan. 1999. Getting acquainted in conversation: A study of initial interaction. (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series), Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Tannen, Deborah. 1984. Conversational style: Analysing talk among friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Tannen, Deborah. 1986. That's not what I meant! How conversational style makes or breaks your relations with others. New York: William Morrow.
  • Tannen, Deborah. 1989. Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tannen, Deborah. 1990. You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. London: Virago Press.
  • Thomsen, Christa. 2000. Stratégies d'argumentation et de politesse dans les conversarions d'affaires. Berne: Peter Lang.
  • Traverso, Véronique. 1999. L'analyse des conversations. Paris: Nathan.
  • Traverso, Véronique. 2006. Des échanges ordinaires à Damas: Aspects de l'interaction en arabe (approche comparative et interculturelle). Damas-Lyon : Presses de l'IFPO-PUL.
  • Walton, Douglas. 1989. Question-reply argumentation. New York: Greenwood Press.
  • Walton, Douglas. 1999. Profiles of dialogue for evaluating arguments from ignorance. Argumentation 13: 53-71.
  • Walton, Douglas and Krabbe, Erik C. W. 1995. Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Zartman, I. William. 2001. Preventive negotiation: Avoiding conflict escalation. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Zeldin, T. 1999. De la conversation. Paris: Fayard.